A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to amend the authority of local governments to regulate wireless telecommunication facilities to comply with the middle class tax relief AND job creation act of 2012 (P.L. 112‑96).
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1.  Article 19 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes reads as rewritten:
"Part 3E. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities.
"§ 160A‑400.50.  Purpose and compliance with federal law.
(a)	The purpose of this section is to ensure the safe and efficient integration of facilities necessary for the provision of advanced mobile broadband and wireless telecommunications services throughout the community and to ensure the ready availability of reliable wireless service to the public, government agencies, and first responders, with the intention of furthering the public safety and general welfare.
(a1)	The deployment of wireless infrastructure is critical to ensuring first responders can provide for the health and safety of all residents of North Carolina and that, consistent with Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112‑96, which, among other things, creates a national wireless emergency communications network for use by first responders that in large measure will be dependent on facilities placed on existing wireless communications support structures, it is the policy of this State to facilitate the placement of wireless communications support structures in all areas of North Carolina. The following standards shall apply to a city's actions, as a regulatory body, in the regulation of the placement, construction, or modification of a wireless communications facility.
(b)	The placement, construction, or modification of wireless communications facilities shall be in conformity with the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 332 as amended, and in accordance with the rules promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission.
"§ 160A‑400.51.  Definitions.
The following definitions apply in this Part.
(1)	Antenna. – Communications equipment that transmits and receives electromagnetic radio signals used in the provision of all types of wireless communications services.
(2)	Application. – A formal request submitted to the city to construct or modify a wireless support structure or a wireless facility.
(3)	Building permit. – An official administrative authorization issued by the city prior to beginning construction consistent with the provisions of G.S. 160A‑417.
(4)	Collocation. – The placement or installation of wireless facilities on existing structures, including electrical transmission towers, water towers, buildings, and other structures capable of structurally supporting the attachment of wireless facilities in compliance with applicable codes. The term collocation includes the placement, replacement, or modification of wireless facilities within a previously approved equipment compound. The term collocation further includes any modification of a wireless support structure that does not meet the definition of a substantial modification.
(5)	Equipment compound. – An area surrounding or near the base of a wireless support structure within which a wireless facility is located.
(5a)	Fall zone. – The area in which a wireless support structure may be expected to fall in the event of a structural failure, as measured by engineering standards.
(6)	Land development regulation. – Any ordinance enacted pursuant to this Part.
(7)	Search ring. – The area within which a wireless facility must be located in order to meet service objectives of the wireless service provider using the wireless facility or wireless support structure.
(7a)	Substantial modification. – The mounting of a proposed wireless facility on a wireless support structure which:
a.	Increases the existing vertical height of the structure by:
1.	More than ten percent (10%), or
2.	The height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet, whichever is greater; or
b.	Involves adding an appurtenance to the body of a wireless support structure that protrudes horizontally from the edge of the wireless support structure more than 20 feet or more than the width of the wireless support structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater (except where necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable); or
c.	Increases the square footage of the existing equipment compound by more than 2,500 square feet.
(8)	Utility pole. – A structure that is designed for and used to carry lines, cables, or wires for telephone, cable television, or electricity, or to provide lighting.
(8a)	Water tower. – A water storage tank, a standpipe, or an elevated tank situated on a support structure originally constructed for use as a reservoir or facility to store or deliver water.
(9)	Wireless facility. – The set of equipment and network components, exclusive of the underlying support structure or tower, including antennas, transmitters, receivers, base stations, power supplies, cabling, and associated equipment necessary to provide wireless data and telecommunications services to a discrete geographic area.
(10)	Wireless support structure. – A new or existing structure, such as a monopole, lattice tower, or guyed tower that is designed to support or capable of supporting wireless facilities. A utility pole is not a wireless support structure.
"§ 160A‑400.52.  Construction of new wireless support structures or substantial modifications of wireless support structures.
(a)	A city may plan for and regulate the siting or modification of new wireless support structures or the substantial modification of wireless support structures and wireless facilities in accordance with land development regulations and in conformity with this Part. Except as expressly stated, nothing in this Part shall limit a city from regulating applications to construct, substantially modify, or maintain wireless support structures, or construct, substantially modify, maintain, or collocate wireless facilities on a wireless support structure based on consideration of land use, public safety, and zoning considerations, including aesthetics, landscaping, structural design, setbacks, and fall zones, or State and local building code requirements, consistent with the provisions of federal law provided in G.S. 160A‑400.50. For purposes of this Part, public safety shall not include requirements relating to radio frequency emissions of wireless facilities.
(b)	Any person that proposes to construct or substantially modify a wireless support structure or wireless facility within the planning and land‑use jurisdiction of a city must do both of the following:
(1)	Submit a completed application with the necessary copies and attachments to the appropriate planning authority.
(2)	Comply with any local ordinances concerning land use and any applicable permitting processes.
(c)	A city's review of an application for the placement, construction, or substantial modification of a wireless facility or wireless support structure shall only address public safety, land development, or zoning issues. In reviewing an application, the city may not require information on or evaluate an applicant's business decisions about its designed service, customer demand for its service, or quality of its service to or from a particular area or site. In reviewing an application, the city may review the following:
(1)	Applicable public safety, land use, or zoning issues addressed in its adopted regulations, including aesthetics, landscaping, land‑use based location priorities, structural design, setbacks, and fall zones.
(2)	Information or materials directly related to an identified public safety, land development, or zoning issue including evidence that no existing or previously approved structure can reasonably be used for the antenna placement instead of the construction of a new tower, that residential, historic, and designated scenic areas cannot be served from outside the area, or that the proposed height of a new tower or initial antenna placement or a proposed height increase of a modified tower, replacement tower, or collocation is necessary to provide the applicant's designed service.
(3)	A city may require applicants for new wireless facilities to evaluate the reasonable feasibility of collocating new antennas and equipment on an existing structure or structures within the applicant's search ring. Collocation on an existing structure is not reasonably feasible if collocation is technically or commercially impractical or the owner of the tower is unwilling to enter into a contract for such use at fair market value. Cities may require information necessary to determine whether collocation on existing structures is reasonably feasible.
		
(f)	A city may fix and charge an application fee, consulting fee, or other fee associated with the submission, review, processing, and approval of an application to site new wireless support structures or substantially modify wireless support structures or wireless facilities that is based on the costs of the services provided and does not exceed what is usual and customary for such services. Any charges or fees assessed by a city on account of an outside consultant shall be fixed in advance and incorporated into a permit or application fee and shall be based on the reasonable costs to be incurred by the city in connection with the regulatory review authorized under this section. The foregoing does not prohibit a city from imposing additional reasonable and cost based fees for costs incurred should an applicant amend its application. On request, the amount of the consultant charges incorporated into the permit or application fee shall be separately identified and disclosed to the applicant.
(g)	The city may condition approval of an application for a new wireless support structure on the provision of documentation prior to the issuance of a building permit establishing the existence of one or more parties, including the owner of the wireless support structure, who intend to locate wireless facilities on the wireless support structure. A city shall not deny an initial land‑use or zoning permit based on such documentation. A city may condition a permit on a requirement to construct facilities within a reasonable period of time, which shall be no less than 24 months.
(h)	The city may not require the placement of wireless support structures or wireless facilities on city owned or leased property, but may develop a process to encourage the placement of wireless support structures or facilities on city owned or leased property, including an expedited approval process.
(i)	This section shall not be construed to limit the provisions or requirements of any historic district or landmark regulation adopted pursuant to Part 3C of this Article.
"§ 160A‑400.53.  Collocation and other nonsubstantial modifications of wireless facilities.
(a)	Pursuant to Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112‑96, a city may not deny and shall approve any application for collocation as defined in this Part.
(a1)	A collocation application shall be deemed complete unless the city provides notice that the application is incomplete in writing to the applicant within 45 days of submission or within some other mutually agreed upon time frame. The notice shall identify the deficiencies in the application which, if cured, would make the application complete. The application shall be deemed complete on resubmission if the additional materials cure the deficiencies indicated.
(a2)	The city shall issue a written decision approving a collocation application within 45 days of such application being deemed complete.
(a3)	A city may impose a fee not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00) for technical consultation and the review of a collocation application. The fee must be based on the actual, direct, and reasonable administrative costs incurred for the review, processing, and approval of a collocation application. A city may engage a third‑party consultant for technical consultation and the review of a collocation application. The fee imposed by a city for the review of the application may not be used for either of the following:
(1)	Travel expenses incurred in a third party's review of a collocation application.
(2)	Reimbursement for a consultant or other third party based on a contingent fee basis or results‑based arrangement.
							"
SECTION 2.  Article 18 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes reads as rewritten:
"Part 3B. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities.
"§ 153A‑349.50.  Purpose and compliance with federal law.
(a)	Purpose. – The purpose of this section is to ensure the safe and efficient integration of facilities necessary for the provision of advanced mobile broadband and wireless telecommunications services throughout the community and to ensure the ready availability of reliable wireless service to the public, government agencies, and first responders, with the intention of furthering the public safety and general welfare.
(a1)	The deployment of wireless infrastructure is critical to ensuring first responders can provide for the health and safety of all residents of North Carolina and that, consistent with Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112‑96, which, among other things, creates a national wireless emergency communications network for use by first responders that in large measure will be dependent on facilities placed on existing wireless communications support structures, it is the policy of this State to facilitate the placement of wireless communications support structures in all areas of North Carolina. The following standards shall apply to a county's actions, as a regulatory body, in the regulation of the placement, construction, or modification of a wireless communications facility.
(b)	Compliance with the Federal Communications Act. – The placement, construction, or modification of wireless communications facilities shall be in conformity with the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 332 as amended, and in accordance with the rules promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission.
"§ 153A‑349.51.  Definitions.
The following definitions apply in this Part:
(1)	Antenna. – Communications equipment that transmits and receives electromagnetic radio signals used in the provision of all types of wireless communications services.
(2)	Application. – A formal request submitted to the county to construct or modify a wireless support structure or a wireless facility.
(3)	Building permit. – An official administrative authorization issued by the county prior to beginning construction consistent with the provisions of G.S. 153A‑357.
(4)	Collocation. – The placement or installation of wireless facilities on existing structures, including electrical transmission towers, water towers, buildings, and other structures capable of structurally supporting the attachment of wireless facilities in compliance with applicable codes. The term collocation includes the placement, replacement, or modification of wireless facilities within a previously approved equipment compound. The term collocation further includes any modification of a wireless support structure that does not meet the definition of a substantial modification.
(5)	Equipment compound. – An area surrounding or near the base of a wireless support structure within which a wireless facility is located.
(5a)	Fall zone. – The area in which a wireless support structure may be expected to fall in the event of a structural failure, as measured by engineering standards.
(6)	Land development regulation. – Any ordinance enacted pursuant to this Part.
(7)	Search ring. – The area within which a wireless facility must be located in order to meet service objectives of the wireless service provider using the wireless facility or wireless support structure.
(7a)	Substantial modification. – The mounting of a proposed wireless facility on a wireless support structure which:
a.	Increases the existing vertical height of the structure by:
1.	More than ten percent (10%), or
2.	The height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet, whichever is greater; or
b.	Involves adding an appurtenance to the body of a wireless support structure that protrudes horizontally from the edge of the wireless support structure more than 20 feet or more than the width of the wireless support structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater (except where necessary to shelter the antenna from inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the tower via cable); or
c.	Increases the square footage of the existing equipment compound by more than 2,500 square feet.
(8)	Utility pole. – A structure that is designed for and used to carry lines, cables, or wires for telephone, cable television, or electricity, or to provide lighting.
(8a)	Water tower. – A water storage tank, a standpipe, or an elevated tank situated on a support structure originally constructed for use as a reservoir or facility to store or deliver water.
(9)	Wireless facility. – The set of equipment and network components, exclusive of the underlying support structure or tower, including antennas, transmitters, receivers, base stations, power supplies, cabling, and associated equipment necessary to provide wireless data and telecommunications services to a discrete geographic area.
(10)	Wireless support structure. – A new or existing structure, such as a monopole, lattice tower, or guyed tower that is designed to support or capable of supporting wireless facilities. A utility pole is not a wireless support structure.
"§ 153A‑349.52.  Construction of new wireless support structures or substantial modifications of wireless support structures.
(a)	A county may plan for and regulate the siting or modification of new wireless support structures or the substantial modification of wireless support structures and wireless facilities in accordance with land development regulations and in conformity with this Part. Except as expressly stated, nothing in this Part shall limit a county from regulating applications to construct, substantially modify, or maintain wireless support structures, or construct, substantially modify, maintain, or collocate wireless facilities on a wireless support structure based on consideration of land use, public safety, and zoning considerations, including aesthetics, landscaping, structural design, setbacks, and fall zones, or State and local building code requirements, consistent with the provisions of federal law provided in G.S. 153A‑349.50. For purposes of this Part, public safety shall not include requirements relating to radio frequency emissions of wireless facilities.
(b)	Any person that proposes to construct or substantially modify a wireless support structure or wireless facility within the planning and land‑use jurisdiction of a county must do both of the following:
(1)	Submit a completed application with the necessary copies and attachments to the appropriate planning authority.
(2)	Comply with any local ordinances concerning land use and any applicable permitting processes.
(c)	A county's review of an application for the placement, construction, or substantial modification of a wireless facility or wireless support structure shall only address public safety, land development, or zoning issues. In reviewing an application, the county may not require information on or evaluate an applicant's business decisions about its designed service, customer demand for its service, or quality of its service to or from a particular area or site. In reviewing an application the county may review the following:
(1)	Applicable public safety, land use, or zoning issues addressed in its adopted regulations, including aesthetics, landscaping, land‑use based location priorities, structural design, setbacks, and fall zones.
(2)	Information or materials directly related to an identified public safety, land development or zoning issue including evidence that no existing or previously approved structure can reasonably be used for the antenna placement instead of the construction of a new tower, that residential, historic, and designated scenic areas cannot be served from outside the area, or that the proposed height of a new tower or initial antenna placement or a proposed height increase of a modified tower, replacement tower, or collocation is necessary to provide the applicant's designed service.
(3)	A county may require applicants for new wireless facilities to evaluate the reasonable feasibility of collocating new antennas and equipment on an existing structure or structures within the applicant's search ring. Collocation on an existing structure is not reasonably feasible if collocation is technically or commercially impractical or the owner of the tower is unwilling to enter into a contract for such use at fair market value. Counties may require information necessary to determine whether collocation on existing structures is reasonably feasible.
		
(f)	A county may fix and charge an application fee, consulting fee, or other fee associated with the submission, review, processing, and approval of an application to site new wireless support structures or substantially modify wireless support structures or wireless facilities that is based on the costs of the services provided and does not exceed what is usual and customary for such services. Any charges or fees assessed by a county on account of an outside consultant shall be fixed in advance and incorporated into a permit or application fee and shall be based on the reasonable costs to be incurred by the county in connection with the regulatory review authorized under this section. The foregoing does not prohibit a county from imposing additional reasonable and cost based fees for costs incurred should an applicant amend its application. On request, the amount of the consultant charges incorporated into the permit or application fee shall be separately identified and disclosed to the applicant.
(g)	The county may condition approval of an application for a new wireless support structure on the provision of documentation prior to the issuance of a building permit establishing the existence of one or more parties, including the owner of the wireless support structure, who intend to locate wireless facilities on the wireless support structure. A county shall not deny an initial land‑use or zoning permit based on such documentation. A county may condition a permit on a requirement to construct facilities within a reasonable period of time, which shall be no less than 24 months.
(h)	The county may not require the placement of wireless support structures or wireless facilities on county owned or leased property, but may develop a process to encourage the placement of wireless support structures or facilities on county owned or leased property, including an expedited approval process.
(i)	This section shall not be construed to limit the provisions or requirements of any historic district or landmark regulation adopted pursuant to Part 3C of this Article.
"§ 153A‑349.53.  Collocation and other nonsubstantial modifications of wireless facilities.
(a)	Pursuant to Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, Pub. L. No. 112‑96, a county may not deny and shall approve any application for collocation as defined in this Part.
(a1)	A collocation application shall be deemed complete unless the county provides notice that the application is incomplete in writing to the applicant within 45 days of submission or within some other mutually agreed upon time frame. The notice shall identify the deficiencies in the application which, if cured, would make the application complete. The application shall be deemed complete on resubmission if the additional materials cure the deficiencies identified.
(a2)	The county shall issue a written decision approving a collocation application within 45 days of such application being deemed complete.
(a3)	A county may impose a fee not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00) for technical consultation and the review of a collocation application. The fee must be based on the actual, direct, and reasonable administrative costs incurred for the review, processing, and approval of a collocation application. A county may engage a third‑party consultant for technical consultation and the review of a collocation application. The fee imposed by a county for the review of the application may not be used for either of the following:
(1)	Travel expenses incurred in a third party's review of a collocation application.
(2)	Reimbursement for a consultant or other third party based on a contingent fee basis or results‑based arrangement.
		
					"
SECTION 3.  This act becomes effective October 1, 2013, and applies to collocation applications received on or after that date.